Re: [whatwg] Effect of image-orientation on naturalWidth/Height from Anne van Kesteren on 2015-03-10 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from March 2015)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:29:01 +0100
To: Seth Fowler <seth@mozilla.com>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Message-ID: <CADnb78inh+ggQsDKwqEOZ7xmowNvDGHcCDaOM0f=E_PJi3W-XA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Seth Fowler <seth@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I wanted to get the opinion of this list on how image-orientation and the <img> element’s naturalWidth and naturalHeight properties should interact.

I thought there was some agreement that image-orientation ought to be
a markup feature as it affects the semantics of the image (or perhaps
investigate whether rotating automatically is feasible):

  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25508


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 08:29:26 UTC