- From: Ezequiel Garzón <garzon.lucero@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:54:43 +0200
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Thanks for filing the bug report, Simon. I'm thrilled if I can make a even tiny contribution. It looks like it was already reported on October 6? Best regards, Ezequiel On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:56:45 +0200, Ezequiel Garzón > <garzon.lucero@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Greetings! I believe the current standards has an oversight in the >> current rules for omission of the p element's end tag: >> >> "A p element's end tag can be omitted if the p element is immediately >> followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, div, dl, fieldset, >> footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, header, hgroup, hr, main, menu, >> nav, ol, p, pre, section, table, or ul, element, or if there is no >> more content in the parent element and the parent element is not an a >> element." >> >> Shouldn't the new figure element be in that list? >> >> Thanks and cheers, >> >> Ezequiel > > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26981 > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software
Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 09:55:10 UTC