- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 20:01:22 +0100
- To: rescator@emsai.net, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Roger Hågensen <rescator@emsai.net> writes: > A link element in the header, maybe call it <link rel="share" > href="http://example.com/article/12345/" /> > or <link rel="share" /> if the current url (or the canonical url link if > present) should be used, although I guess in a way rel="share" will > probably replace the need to use rel="canonical" in the long run. I do not understand. Why should one invent a rel value (“share”) that conveys the same semantics as an already existing one (“canonical”) ? -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 19:01:53 UTC