- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 00:34:43 +0200
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> writes: > We have an API for compression already. It already supports a > compression level argument for JPEG. Having an equivalent argument > for PNG is a no-brainer. The only difference to JPEG is that it > should be described as the "compression level" rather than "quality > level", since with PNG it has no effect on quality, only the file size > and time it takes to compress. What benefit does it give then if the result is the same perceptually? -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 22:35:42 UTC