Re: [whatwg] Proposal: toDataURL “image/png” compression control

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 5/29/14, 5:13 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>
>> Assembly language is inherently incompatible with the Web.
>>
>
> A SIMD API, however is not.  Under the hood, it can be implemented in
> terms of MMX, SSE, NEON, or just by forgetting about the SIMD bit and
> pretending like you have separate operations.  In particular, you could
> have a SIMD API that desugars to plain JS as the default implementation in
> browsers but that JITs can recognize and vectorize as they desire. This
> sort of API will happen, for sure.
>

I doubt it, at least with performance competitive with native assembly.  We
certainly shouldn't delay features while we hope for it.

-- 
Glenn Maynard

Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 21:28:33 UTC