- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 13:18:40 +0200
- To: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>
- Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Justin Novosad <junov@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> This is an interesting idea. I don't know what the state of the other >> methods discussed here is (see my comment at the top of the e-mail cited >> above). However, I've filed a bug for this too: >> >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25647 >> >> I think what might make the most sense here is to have a way to >> destructively convert an ImageBitmap into an <img>, rather than doing >> anything with a canvas. > > What would go in the 'src' attribute of the image element? A a data URL? Maybe we should have <img>.srcObject similar to what we're doing for media elements. <img>.src can simply return about:imagebitmap or some such. That way you can also assign a Blob to an <img> element without having to do the weird createObjectURL() hack that might leak memory if you're not careful. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2014 11:19:07 UTC