- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:37:44 -0700
- To: Mathias Bynens <mathiasb@opera.com>
- Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Tao Bai <michaelbai@google.com>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Mathias Bynens <mathiasb@opera.com> wrote: > On 26 Jun 2014, at 22:24, Mathias Bynens <mathiasb@opera.com> wrote: > >> Interesting to see this would be only the second HTML attribute value to get parsed as a simple color (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-microsyntaxes.html#simple-color) rather than a legacy color (the other one being `<input type=color value=foo>`). > > Actually, the way it’s currently specced it wouldn’t be a parsed as a simple color value nor as a legacy color value. It should probably be one or the other (rather than introducing a third, new way to parse color values). https://github.com/whatwg/meta-brand-color/issues/1 Well, the third way is "as CSS", which already exists in the platform. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 20:38:32 UTC