- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:01:05 -0500
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 2/20/14 11:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > (If people used rAF for what it was *intended* for, we could probably > have stopped firing it *entirely* when the window isn't visible. We do. At least Chrome and Firefox do. > Instead, we had to compromise with the 1s refresh rate instead.) That's what Chrome and Firefox do for setTimeout/setInterval. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 17:01:51 UTC