W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2013

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Change HTML spec to allow any arbitrary value for the <meta> "name" attribute

From: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 10:08:45 +0100
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Message-ID: <20130604090845.GB2071@stripey.com>
Michael[tm] Smith writes:

> Speaking from my perspective as a contributor to development of a
> conformance checker: In practice, we receive a lot of comments and bug
> reports from confused/frustrated users who are trying to use values
> for meta@name that are not registered.

Hi Mike. Thanks for sharing your wisdom on this.

Could you give some examples of the kinds of <meta> names people are
using?

And do you have an idea which user-agents are acting on those names?

I'm interested in whether the <meta> tags people are using are
meaningless cruft or have useful effects in niche fields.

> And as far as the strategy of trying to use the spec and Wiki page as
> a means to educate them about trying to taking the time to register
> meta@name values and only use registered values and standard values
> (those listed in the spec), well, that strategy is not working well.
> They just want the validator to shut up.

How about a validator interface along the lines of:

  I see you've used a <meta name=kapow> tag. kapow isn't a <meta> name
  that I know about. Are you sure that it's a correct name, and that
  it's doing something useful in your document?

  If so, please tell me its purpose here, then I'll know what it's for
  and I won't complain about it again: ______________________________

Then the validator could add a wiki entry for it.

Cheers

Smylers
-- 
Stop drug companies hiding negative research results.
Sign the AllTrials petition to get all clinical research results published.
Read more: http://www.alltrials.net/blog/the-alltrials-campaign/
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 09:09:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:21 UTC