- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:21:07 -0400
- To: Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com> wrote: > I don't see this as a security risk, and if the behavior is desirable, it > seems fairly well-scoped in terms of specifying it. For now I've not done this because it would mean that purported absolute URLs would not round trip. "file:c:..." is treated as an absolute path now though (rather than one relative to the base's path as it was before). -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 15 July 2013 18:21:34 UTC