- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:57:32 -0400
- To: Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com> wrote: > Given how unlikely it is that someone will have registered a scheme handler > for the one-character drive letters, the Chrome/IE behavior seems more > forgiving and more likely what the author wants, to me. But it also forks the semantics of generic URLs, or at least when the base URL happens to be a file URL. Those kind of exceptions are not exactly ideal. In particular treating an absolute URL as a relative URL under certain circumstances seems bad. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 17:57:58 UTC