- From: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 16:38:22 -0400
- To: Tom Wiltzius <wiltzius@chromium.org>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Mark Callow <callow.mark@artspark.co.jp>, Brian Salomon <bsalomon@chromium.org>
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Tom Wiltzius <wiltzius@chromium.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Mark Callow <callow.mark@artspark.co.jp > >wrote: > > > I thought some pretty strong objections were raised to text decoration. > > Why are you actively developing it? > > > > There were some concerns cited, as well as some unresolved debate about the > exact shape of the API, but my read is that the objections aren't > sufficiently fundamental to block prototyping (such that we might gain some > implementation experience to inform the API's development). > > The strong objections were more general opposition to the use of text in 2D canvas because of its various shortcomings (accessibility, crawling, etc) IMHO, that is a completely different debate than the question of whether or not the canvas text should have more bells and whistles.
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 20:38:49 UTC