- From: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:37:11 -0400
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
That's an interesting idea. I suppose the fully general solution would be to have a "stroke offset". E.g., with a stroke width of 4 and and offset of 2 you'd get "outer", offset -2 you'd get "inner", offset 1 you'd get 3 pixels outer and 1 pixel inner, etc. Dunno how useful that is, though. Stephen On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>wrote: > >> If the stroke was instead drawn centered over half pixels, the stroked >> > rects would be centered along (5.5, 5.5) -> (14.5, 5.5) -> (14.5, 14.5) -> >> (14.5, 5.5) -> (5.5, 5.5). This would touch pixels 5->15 in each >> dimension. >> If drawn with transparency, the resulting left and top edges would look >> different than the bottom and right edges. E.g., >> http://jsfiddle.net/9xbkX/ > > > My proposal addresses this, by adding an "outer" stroke mode. > http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2013-July/040252.html > > -- > Glenn Maynard > >
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 21:37:36 UTC