On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > I wanted vendors to solidify consensus on a version close to what currently exists, with minor changes for accessibility. The WHATWG and W3C have chosen instead to make broad changes, as proposed in version 5/the Hixie-Atkins draft. Out of curiosity, why are you using the term "the Hixie-Atkins draft"? That usage seems bizarre. ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 01:25:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:10 GMT