What of the fact that this breaks existing pages with <input id="Path"> that access it as just Path? Historically this has been a non-starter for new APIs. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com> wrote: >> I was looking at the canvas Path API and had some concerns. In >> particular it's inconsistent with the rest of canvas: >> >> We already have CanvasGradient and CanvasPattern in the global >> namespace, so this should probably be called CanvasPath. >> >> We also have createLinearGradient() and createPattern(), but this new >> thing is "new Path". >> >> Could we get some consistency here? Like adding new CanvasGradient() >> (or a createPath() method) to match up with Path and renaming this >> thing CanvasPath? > > I think the SVGWG would be opposed to that - we rather like the Path > api and would appreciate being able to appropriate it for our own uses > (merging with the <path> API). > > I'm fine with gradients/patterns moving to a plain constructor rather > than a factory method, though. > > ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 23:59:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:10 GMT