W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2012

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for Links to Unrelated Browsing Contexts

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:16:30 +0000 (UTC)
To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210020714300.1904@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> >
> >  Primary goals:
> >  + have the new page use a different event loop if possible (new process)
> >  + have the window of the new page not be able to reach the opener via
> >     a named window.open() or target=""
> >
> > As a result, I think these are also necessary features:
> > ...
> >  + have the new page be in a new browsing context
> 
> It doesn't seem like you need a new browsing context to achieve both of 
> the above.  (Maybe it's easier to implement in today's multi-process 
> browsers, if you happen to be opening a new tab at the same time you 
> start a new process, but that seems like an implementation detail.)

You need a new WindowProxy object, otherwise anything that had access to 
it before still has access, and thus can't be in a new event loop. Saying 
you need a new WindowProxy object is basically equivalent to saying you 
need a new browsing context.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 07:17:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:10 GMT