W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2012

Re: [whatwg] [mimesniff] Review requested on MIME Sniffing Standard

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:08:46 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Gordon P. Hemsley" <gphemsley@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1211122307050.15000@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, whatwg List <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
> 
> But if everyone vows to just wait for 512 bytes (or EOF), then that's 
> fine with me.

I don't think we should require tools to wait for 512 bytes. This is an 
area where if we have the requirement, some user agents are just going to 
have a timeout anyway and ignore the spec; we gain nothing by making it 
non-conforming to have a timeout.

> > What are the use cases for ‘Sniffing archives specifically’?
> 
> No idea. I only included it for completeness.

Please don't spec things for completeness without use cases. :-)

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 23:09:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:11 GMT