- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:47:53 +0200
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > I think we shouldn't put the parsing algorithm on a pedestal while not > giving the same treatment to the default UA style sheet or other > requirements related to an element that have to be implemented. The difference between the parsing algorithm on the UA stylesheet is that authors can put display: block; in the author stylesheet during the transition. That said, the example jgraham showed to me on IRC convinced me that if <main> is introduced to the platform, it makes sense to make it parse like <article>. :-( (I’m not a fan of the consequences of the “feature” of making </p> optional. Too bad that feature is ancient and it’s too late on undo it.) I guess I’ll focus on objecting to new void elements and especially to new children of <head>. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 12:49:01 UTC