W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2012

Re: [whatwg] The set of supported @type values for <script> is a bit odd

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 08:32:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78gyTajwKCAydVVhz=YY_cSO2iXwHju-vxWu6U60g05O2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
> If the weird values are just for compatibility, then I think it would be better to change the spec to drop the ones no one implements. I certainly would not want the list of versioned types to expand over time with new JavaScript versions, so there is no need for it to be a consistent or logical set.

That is done to define language and type using the same underlying
list of values. We can of course change the way language ought to be
implemented.


-- 
Anne — Opera Software
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
Received on Saturday, 26 May 2012 06:32:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:08 GMT