W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2012

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:26:36 -0700
Message-id: <D80D4CF2-E6E5-4AB7-A05D-3CA96A8D04B3@apple.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Matthew Wilcox <mail@matthewwilcox.com>, PJ McCormick <pj@mynameispj.com>

On May 16, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Matthew Wilcox <mail@matthewwilcox.com> wrote:
>> Chalk me up as another making that mistake. Properties on elements
>> usually describe a property of the element. Not a property of
>> something else (like the viewport).
> 
> If it does indeed rely on a rendering issue (like the size of the
> viewport), wouldn't it make more sense to make it a CSS feature? I
> think that would be less confusing and follow better the established
> separation of layout in html, styling(/rendering) in CSS.

CSS can handle this fine for presentational images (such as CSS background images). But it's not obvious that it's the best way to influence selection of content images references from <img>. Content images are meaningful, not just stylistic, so their variants are meaningful too (even if the choice of variant is influenced by presentational issues).

Cheers,
Maciej
 
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 05:27:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:08 GMT