W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2012

Re: [whatwg] Throwing in my support for <picture> into the mix

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 15:57:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4FB3B266.1030503@gmx.de>
To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org, Paul Court <paul@pmcnetworks.co.uk>
On 2012-05-16 15:46, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Paul Court<paul@pmcnetworks.co.uk>  wrote:
>
>> First, I would like to suggest throwing<img srcset>  out the window and
>> into a landfill somewhere (It's not even fit for recycling!). This reminds
>> me if the recent semi-colon in JavaScript "debate" that erupted as a result
>> of @fat's code in the Twitter Bootstrap project - To one or two people who
>> are very specialised in their particular area, it seems like a non issue -
>> and I think that is the case with the<img srcset>  syntax. From a browser
>> developer point of view it might be easier to implement, but from a "I'm
>> just learning to code" point of view, that syntax is bat-shit crazy!
>>
>
> It's a simple, unambiguous, extensible format.  If you don't like this
> ...

It is?

Quick check, do

   srcset="a,b"

and

   srcset="a, b"

mean the same thing?

And what about

   srcset="a ,b"

?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 13:58:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:08 GMT