W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2012

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:57:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78gcTU4tr2OvkqidroRDtD9s4ztQOxCf7FNDSEQb5H8f2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <mail@matthewwilcox.com>
Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Wilcox <mail@matthewwilcox.com> wrote:
> Please, have you taken a look at the latest idea?
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/respimg/2012/05/13/an-alternative-proposition-to-and-srcset-with-wider-scope/

It was quoted and replied to in the email you just replied to.

It has many problems. It adds a level of indirection, it imposes
constraints on where the resources are located and how they are named,
it requires access to the <head> element for adding an image in a blog
post, and it makes processing of URLs conditional on information
provided elsewhere. These are all significant issues.

I also do not see how it addresses the pixel density use case. You
cannot use a media query for that because a media query queries the
pixel density of the device, it does not *set* the pixel density of
the resource.


-- 
Anne — Opera Software
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 09:57:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:08 GMT