- From: Ian Melven <imelven@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, david-sarah@jacaranda.org
ah ok, yes, it seems that we misunderstood - thanks for the clarification ! ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> To: "Ian Melven" <imelven@mozilla.com> Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, david-sarah@jacaranda.org Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 7:14:09 AM Subject: Re: [whatwg] sandboxed documents and cookies On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Ian Melven <imelven@mozilla.com> wrote: > IE 10, Chrome and the patches I am working on for Firefox all throw a SecurityError > even if no cookies are set - i agree that this seems like the correct behaviour. It seems you misunderstand the term cookie-free Document object. It's a specific kind of Document object, used by XMLHttpRequest (and maybe ought to be used for DOMParser and such too). I believe from testing the behavior for XMLHttpRequest is different in browsers from throwing, although I would prefer if they were consistent there. -- Anne — Opera Software http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 15:34:46 UTC