W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2012

Re: [whatwg] alt and title attribute exception

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:36:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEhSh3fEP41rNQvm1ciwcU9k96ZkCQ2nbXV=zdZ_p9MAvXi1cA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Chaals McCathieNevile <w3b@chaals.com>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Steve Faulkner
<faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The alt attribute does not represent advisory information. User agents must
>> not present the contents of the alt attribute in the same way as content
>> of the title attribute.


> In situations where alt it not
> present on an img but title is, in webkit based browsers the title
> attribute content is displayed on mouse hover and is also displayed in
> place of the image when images are disabled or not available. This
> implementation appears to contradict the must requirement in the spec.

Debatable. It's not showing @alt on hover, so their presentation is different.

I think showing @alt on hover, as IE used to do, was the behavior this
text was intending to discourage. That this behavior was wrong was
after all a major tenet of:


This was premised on @alt being (potentially long) equivalent text
rather than being a short name for the image though. Once both @alt
and @title can be used to provide what could loosely be called titling
information, the rationale for presenting the two differently begins
to weaken.

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:37:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:14 UTC