W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2012

Re: [whatwg] Suggest making <dt> and <dd> valid in <ol>

From: Ian Yang <ian@invigoreight.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:52:21 +0800
Message-ID: <CABr1FscfhfvJkDiE3hDvfKDqOi3DcpCrOjMmugQs5Rok7j7bBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Bishop <alexbishop@gmail.com>
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Alex Bishop <alexbishop@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 19/07/2012 08:04, Ian Yang wrote:
>
>> Since the *optional *use of <li> in <dl> could solve many problems, may we
>>
>> have <li> being valid in <dl>?
>>
>
> Probably not, as it has similar drawbacks as the proposed <di> element:
>
>
> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#HTML_should_group_.3Cdt.3Es_and_.3Cdd.3Es_together_in_.3Cdi.3Es.21
>

Thanks. However, the drawbacks mentioned in that document is about the
nonexistent <di>, not the existent <li>.

<li> in <dl> is rendered without problems in IE6+, FF3.6+, Chrome, and
Safari. Only in Opera that definition term and the bullet aren't at the
same line.

Furthermore, browsers need to be compliant with the standards, not the
standers need to be compliant with browsers. If the latter were true, we
wouldn't have had so many new HTML5 elements to use.


Sincerely,
Ian Yang
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 00:52:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:09 GMT