Re: [whatwg] seamless iframes

On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>
> 1.  We should add iframe[seamless] { display:block; }. 
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#embedded-content-2 
> already expects iframe:not([seamless]) { border: 2px inset; }. In 90% 
> percent of uses, seamless iframes will not want a border and will want 
> to fill their container. This way, seamless iframes behave roughly like 
> sandboxable divs, which is what web developers want.

Done.


> 2. 
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-iframe-seamless 
> "In visual media, in a CSS-supporting user agent: the user agent should 
> set the intrinsic width of the iframe to the width that the element 
> would have if it was a non-replaced block-level element with 'width: 
> auto'."
>
> This doesn't get the behavior you'd want with cases that need
> shrink-wrapped behavior. Some cases that need handling:
> <iframe seamless style="display:inline">
> <iframe seamless style="display:inline-block">
> <iframe seamless style="float:left">
> <iframe seamless style="position:absolute">

Done.


On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> 
> 3. The default margin on the body element inside a seamless iframe 
> should be 0. Again, this is what 90%+ of uses will expect. We shouldn't 
> require everyone using seamless iframes to have to set the body's margin 
> to 0.

Done.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 22:54:47 UTC