W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2012

[whatwg] Encodings and the web

From: NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 01:06:43 +0900
Message-ID: <4F09BF13.5030603@airemix.jp>
Hi,

thank you for quick reply,

(2012/01/09 0:38), Lin Jen-Shin (godfat) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:20 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp> wrote:
>> (2012/01/08 23:32), Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 01:37:14 +0100, NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp> wrote:
>>>> = Legacy multi-octet Chinese (traditional) encodings
>>>>
>>>> Mozilla supports another Big5 variants, Big5-UAO.
>>>> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/1784
>>>
>>> As part of the big5 encoding, right? It sounds like it's a good idea to adopt that. I don't think there's much concern about table size these days, though obviously the less complexity the better.
>>
>> CC to the original reporter.
>> Could you cooperate about current situation in Taiwan?
> 
> I am not sure what I can do here, but I would try my best to
> coordinate if there's anything I could help.
> 
> So what are we trying to solve here, again?

This is the thread from
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-December/034241.html

And discussing about a spec about Encoding on the web.
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/encoding/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

I'm interesting about whether web browsers other than Mozilla should implement
Big5-UAO or not.

Thanks,

-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>
Received on Sunday, 8 January 2012 08:06:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:10 UTC