W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2012

[whatwg] IBM864 mapping of Encoding Standard

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:49:34 +0200
Message-ID: <op.wc9bwwdy64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:31:57 +0200, Makoto Kato <m_kato at ga2.so-net.ne.jp>  
> Except to OS/2 and AIX, I think that this encoding is unnecessary since  
> most browsers aren't supported.  If you only add IBM864 and IBM866 to  
> this spec as legacy encoding, you should add all encodings that Gecko  
> supports due to ambiguous.

That could work too. Currently 864 is not supported by Opera and 866 is  
not supported by Chrome. As far as I know the other IBM encodings have  
less support. I suppose we should look at content to see how often they  
are still used on pages with bytes greater than 0x7F.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 23:49:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:12 UTC