W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2011

[whatwg] Feedback on UndoManager spec

From: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:00:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CABNRm60ijknsE10dNfb_ULmBK1z=a5=gzuMc4ABamrn9biODxg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote:
>
> I actually think it's actively bad to converge on having the same
> interface for automatic and manual transaction. The two work in
> dramatically different ways. The code that goes into the "apply"
> function of a automatic transaction has dramatically different meaning
> than the code that goes into the "apply" function for a manual
> transaction since the UA records the actions of the former and stores
> them away.
>

Okay. I'm actually renaming apply, unapply, reapply to execute, undo, and
redo. So how about "automaticExecute"?

- Ryosuke
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 18:00:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:09 UTC