- From: John Giannandrea <jgiann@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:32:57 -0700
Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > The solution John proposed would indeed not handle cross-origin > extensions, which could be problematic. > Cross-origin extensions can still be handled with full URIs for the extension properties. I dont see how you can solve the itemtype="foo" collision case for multiple itemtypes without some explicit statement about the authority who says what the combined vocabulary for a set of itemtypes means. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > <div itemscope itemtype="http://example.com/"> > <meta itemprop="kind" content="A B"> > ... > </div> How does "kind" relate to "type"? Would it be the case that kind informs the short itemprop names also? Is this the same proposal as having an itemprop="type" which means the same thing as itemtype? -jg
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 12:32:57 UTC