- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:36:12 +0200
On 05/31/11 23:45, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, James Salsman wrote:
>> >
>> > Sorry for the top posting, but I would like to reiterate my considered
>> > opinion that Speex be supported for recording. It is the standard
>> > format available from Adobe Flash recording, low bandwidth, open source
>> > and unencumbered, efficient, and it is high quality for its bandwidth.
> My plan with the codecs issue here is to let the implementors figure out
> which codecs they want to implement, and then once there's a common set
> across all the implementations, to require that. So I would recommend
> petitioning the implementors if you have particular codec desires. :-)
>
I can't find James' original post, so this may be a new subject line - I
just want to note that the recent WebRTC code release from Google
contains implementations of both iLBC and iSAC codecs; we believe that
makes them open-source, unencumbered and implemented (with all the usual
disclaimers).
Others will have to discuss the properties that make one or the other
best for a particular application; part of that discussion will happen
on the public-webrtc at w3.org list and the rtcweb at ietf.org list.
Harald
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 06:36:12 UTC