[whatwg] a rel=attachment

On 2011-07-22 09:00, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> (These e-mails were sent after I started working on the previous one.)
>
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Chris Bentzel wrote:
>>
>> Who should be trusted for filename if the one specified by<a>  on the
>> referring page differs from the one specified by Content-Disposition on
>> the to-be-downloaded resource?
>
> I've specified that the header wins.
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> That being said, if you want to go down the road, make it clear how the
>> file name actually is extracted from the header field in an
>> interoperable way.
>
> That isn't really in scope for the HTML spec, it's something either for
> the HTTP spec or the Content-Disposition spec (if HTTP doesn't define th
> header itself) to define.

Is there a specific reason why the new text doesn't mention 
Content-Disposition anymore?

Best regards, Julian