W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2011

[whatwg] abbr inside of option

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1104282204590.19153@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Kenny Graham wrote:
>
> Just curious: What is the reasoning behind the option element not being 
> able to contain abbr elements?  I know current UAs wouldn't do anything 
> with it, but it doesn't break anything either, and IMHO allowing more 
> information is always better than not.

What problem would this solve?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 15:05:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:03 GMT