- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:23:18 +0200
On 04/07/2011 05:55 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Lachlan Hunt<lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote: >> 3. We'd like to get some feedback from web developers, and agreement from >> other browser vendors, about exactly which glyphs are most appropriate to >> use for these disclosure states. We considered two alternatives, but we >> think these three glyphs are the most appropriate. >> >> U+25B8 (?) BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE >> U+25C2 (?) BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE >> U+25BE (?) BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE > > Yup, looks good. FWIW I don't think we need cross-browser agreement here. In particular I think browsers should be free to implement <details> using a platform-native disclose widget if they like. These are not all alike e.g. OSX uses something like ?, Windows something like [+] (I think?) and Gnome (at least with the skin I have) something like ?.
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 02:23:18 UTC