W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2010

[whatwg] Inline Web Worker

From: Samuel Ytterbrink <samuel@ytterbrink.nu>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:19:31 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTintJZ716zt2hJA6GQkCqGE6BqS7-chTj-64eqOp@mail.gmail.com>
Good news. :D

But then i got another problem, why is not
"file:///some_directory_where_the_html_are/" not the same domain as
I understand if it was not okay to go closer to root when ajax,
"file:///where_all_secrete_stuff_are/" or "/../../".

You see i wonder why i need a web-server to try some things. And I'm sure
that there are more developers than me that thinks that local single page
Ajaxs applications have a  future. One thing that could probably solve this
is if the File API will support folders. Then the user could select the
files for the program...

/Samuel Ytterbrink

2010/10/16 Simon Pieters <simonp at opera.com>

> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 03:12:38 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc>
> wrote:
>  Allowing both blob URLs and data URLs for workers sounds like a great
>> idea.
> FWIW, Opera supports data URLs for Worker (but not SharedWorker since it
> could be used to cross the same-origin policy if two pages opened a
> SharedWorker with the same data URL -- this could be solved while still
> supporting data URLs but we decided to just drop it for now).
> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20101016/d852b0f5/attachment.htm>
Received on Saturday, 16 October 2010 08:19:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:01 UTC