W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2010

[whatwg] Handling unknown 'duration's

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:50:13 +1300
Message-ID: <AANLkTinXR7T9opv1AbK64=JbpWpWrCyRwotSDb6DTrPf@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Philip J?genstedt <philipj at opera.com>wrote:

> Agreed, this is how I've interpreted the spec already. If a server replies
> with 200 OK instead of 206 Partial Content and the duration isn't in the
> header of the resource, then the duration is reported to be Infinity. If the
> resource eventually ends another durationchange event is fired and the
> duration is reported to be the (now known) length of the resource.
>

That sounds good to me. We'll probably do that. The spec will need to be
changed though.

Rob
-- 
"Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for
they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures
every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20101220/b8a33b3d/attachment.htm>
Received on Sunday, 19 December 2010 14:50:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:02 UTC