W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2010

[whatwg] Bluetooth devices

From: Roger Hågensen <rescator@emsai.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:02:30 +0100
Message-ID: <4D0AA896.5010403@emsai.net>
On 2010-12-15 18:02, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
> <svartman95 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I still don't grasp how that could be useful. Please provide an example.
>> So you've got a non-kb, mouse, headphone or camera device, say a
>> permanent storage drive.
> No, not something so general-purpose.  Say it's some type of device
> where the market is so small that standardization is infeasible --
> maybe it's only useful in a particular specialty, and there are only
> one or two low-volume vendors.  Or maybe it's some new type of device
> where the market is uncertain and nothing has been standardized yet.
> Given that there's no standard high-level way to interact with the
> device, it might be desirable to have *some* way to interact with it,
> necessarily generic and low-level.  Probably along the lines of
> sending and receiving binary messages.
>
> At least that's the general idea I get.  I can't give any specific
> examples, but I don't think mass-market stuff like permanent storage
> drives is what we're talking about here.  (We already have filesystem
> APIs in the works anyway, right?)  Of course, more specific real-world
> use-cases would be necessary before anyone would consider speccing
> something like this.
>

Something that specific would be better implemented as a browser plugin 
that wrap OS API or a OS driver's API functionality,
if it becomes popular then one or more browser developers would probably 
be interested in supporting it without the need for a browser 
plugin/wrapper,
at which point one just need to follow the guidelines that Ian posts 
here quite frequently to get it standardized.


-- 
Roger "Rescator" H?gensen.
Freelancer - http://www.EmSai.net/
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 16:02:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:02 UTC