W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2010

[whatwg] HTML6 Doctype

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:15:23 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008242313550.1138@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, David Bruant wrote:
> 
> Note after "10.1.1 The DOCTYPE" :
> "DOCTYPEs are required for legacy reasons. When omitted, browsers tend
> to use a different rendering mode that is incompatible with some
> specifications. Including the DOCTYPE in a document ensures that the
> browser makes a best-effort attempt at following the relevant
> specifications."
> 
> Reading the following description, I have the impression that HTML6 will
> require a DOCTYPE as well.
> 
> Following the hypothesis that the HTML language or HTML parser
> definition may change, it means that HTML6 may need a different DOCTYPE
> than HTML5 in order to "[follow] the relevant specifications".

It's likely that there won't be an HTML6 -- not because HTML5 will be the 
last version, but because we've moved to an unversioned development model 
where there is simply a continually-maintained HTML specification that is 
always current.


> What will this doctype be since it cannot be <!DOCTYPE HTML>?

It can be that. HTML is backwards-compatible, meaning that an 
implementation of the spec in 2020 will handle content written to the spec 
in 2010 correctly.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 16:15:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:09:00 UTC