- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:36:19 +0200
Erik Vorhes wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Bruce Lawson<brucel at opera.com> wrote: >> there would also need to be a<comment> element > > I'd be *slightly* concerned that confusion could arise between a > <comment> element and the<!-- comment syntax -->, at least in > discussion. (I.e., what would "HTML comment" mean?) We couldn't use a <comment> element anyway for backwards compatibility reasons. IE does some weird stuff when parsing it. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 06:36:19 UTC