W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > September 2009

[whatwg] Application defined "locks"

From: Aaron Boodman <aa@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:07:16 -0700
Message-ID: <278fd46c0909102207t3b859927jf74c47ba6f9f4bcc@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:35 PM, James Robinson <jamesr at google.com> wrote:
> What about eliminating shared memory (only one context would be allowed
> access to cookies, localStorage, etc)? ?It seems to be working out fine for
> DOM access and is much, much easier to reason about.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Is it that only shared workers can access storage, and each unique
shared worker (by way of its URL or URL+name) gets its own storage

- a
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 22:07:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:52 UTC