W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2009

[whatwg] Link rot is not dangerous

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:45:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4A114A75.5090500@danbri.org>
On 18/5/09 10:34, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On May 15, 2009, at 19:20, Manu Sporny wrote:
>
>> There have been a number of people now that have gone to great lengths
>> to outline how awful link rot is for CURIEs and the semantic web in
>> general. This is a flawed conclusion, based on the assumption that there
>> must be a single vocabulary document in existence, for all time, at one
>> location.
>
> The "flawed" conclusion flows out of "Follow Your Nose" advocacy, and is
> not flawed if one takes "Follow Your Nose" seriously.
>
> It seems to me that the positions that RDF applications should "Follow
> Their Nose" and that link rot is not dangerous (to RDF) are
> contradictory positions.

That's a strong claim. There is certainly a balance to be found between 
taking advantage of de-referencable URIs and relying on their 
de-referencability. De-referencing is a privilege not a right, after all.

If I lost control of xmlns.com tommorrow, and it became un-rescuably 
owned by offshore spam-virus-malware pirates, that doesn't change 
history. For nine years, the FOAF documentation has lived there, and we 
can use URIs to ask other services about what they saw during that 
period: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/

Since there is useful information to know about FOAF properties and 
terms from its schema and human-oriented docs, it would be a shame if 
people ignored that. Since domain names can be lost, it would also be a 
shame if directly de-referencing URIs to the schema was the only way 
people could find that info. Fortunately, neither is the case.

> That link rot hasn't been a practical problem to the Semantic Web
> community suggests that applications don't really Follow Their Nose in
> practice. Can anyone point me to a deployed end user application that
> uses RDF internally and Follows Its Nose?

The search site, sindice.com does this:

"Yes Sindice dereferences URIs it finds in RDF instance data, including 
class and property URIs. It performs OWL reasoning using the retrieved 
information, mostly to infer additional triples based on subclass and 
subproperty relationships. Doing this helps us to increase recall in 
queries." (from Richard Cyganiak, who I asked offlist for confirmation)

Whether you consider sindice.com end-user facing or not, I don't know. I 
put in roughly the same category as Google's Social Graph API. But it's 
a non-trivial implementation that aggregates and integrates a lot of data.

BTW here's another use case for identifying properties and classes by 
URI: we can decentralise the translation of their labels into other 
languages. Here are some Korean descriptions of FOAF, for example: 
http://svn.foaf-project.org/foaftown/foaf18n/foaf-kr.rdf

cheers,

Dan
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 04:45:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:49 UTC