W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2009

[whatwg] Web Addresses vs Legacy Extended IRI

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:51:26 +0100
Message-ID: <op.uq8q30eu64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:46:15 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>  
wrote:
> Because it's preferable to the alternative, which is, leaking out the  
> non-conformant URI/IRI handling into other places.

Apparently that is already happening in part anyway due to LEIRIs. Modulo  
the URL encoding bit (which you can set to always being UTF-8 for non-HTML  
contexts) I'm not sure what's so bad about allowing a few more characters.


> The issue is that it's *not* the same thing.

Well, no, not exactly. But they perform essentially the same task, modulo  
a few characters. And since one is a superset of the other (as long as URL  
encoding is UTF-8) I don't see a point in having both.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 03:51:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:47:49 GMT