W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2009

[whatwg] Web Addresses vs Legacy Extended IRI

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:31:01 +0100
Message-ID: <49C764E5.8010109@gmx.de>
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> I wasn't talking of "browser implementations of feeds", but feed 
>> readers in general.
> 
> Well yes, and a subset of those is browser based. Besides that, most 
> feed readers handle HTML. Do you think they should have two separate URL 
> parsing functions?

Yes, absolutely.

>>>> Don't leak out workarounds into areas where they aren't needed.
>>>  I'm not convinced that having two ways of handling essentially the 
>>> same thing is good.
>>
>> It's unavoidable, as the relaxed syntax doesn't work in many cases, 
>> for instance, when whitespace acts as a delimiter.
> 
> Obviously you would first split on whitepace and then parse the URLs. 
> You can still use the same generic URL handling.

In which case IRI handling should be totally sufficient.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 03:31:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:47:49 GMT