W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2009

[whatwg] <time>

From: Tom Duhamel <tom420.duhamel@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:54:43 -0400
Message-ID: <22c1222d0903142254u41087aa1vd3fae15262937eb0@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Smylers <Smylers at stripey.com> wrote:

> Tom Duhamel writes:
>
> > - Allow only extended format: 2009-03-14 (rather than 20090314) which
> > will help with simplification and future extensions
>
> Note that the draft already requires hyphens, so this wouldn't be a
> change:
>
>
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/infrastructure.html#parse-a-date-component
>
> Smylers
>

Indeed, but others have suggested a change, so (for reasons given in my
other post) I am suggesting that we keep the mandatory hyphens.

Also, I am feeling right now that our current debate have already voided the
existing draft and that we are actually slowly rewriting the whole <time>
section :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090315/6b633297/attachment.htm>
Received on Saturday, 14 March 2009 22:54:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:47:49 GMT