W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2009

[whatwg] <time>

From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils-dagsson-moskopp@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:59:04 +0100
Message-ID: <1236887944.15809.3.camel@desudesudesu>
Am Dienstag, den 10.03.2009, 17:37 -0400 schrieb Aryeh Gregor: 
> A much saner solution seems to be to say that HTML supports exactly
> one type of calendar: in this case, proleptic Gregorian.  Authoring
> tools can be used to convert from other formats to Gregorian.  This is
> the approach already taken by every computing standard I can think of.
>  One fixed format is used for transmission (usually either proleptic
> Gregorian or Unix time).  HTTP is one example of a widely-used format
> that does this already.

Now that we have formally established that, what exactly prevents us
from going the ISO 8601 route (maybe with a "recommended subset") ?

-- 
Nils Dagsson Moskopp
<http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 12:59:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:47:49 GMT