- From: Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:54:35 -0700
'Named' cache groups under a single manifest url is an interesting idea. Presumably the webapp would be generating the 'name' in the manifest file based on a cookie value. Another possibility is something along the lines of what is proposed in the DataCache draft: the manifest indicates a cookie name, and the value of that cookie determines the 'name' of the subgroup. And the value of that cookie also determines which subgroup is enabled at any given time. On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Adam de Boor wrote: > > > > the difficulty with a named-section option is that the manifest > generation > > for an application would have to know which users use a particular > machine, > > which is pretty much a non-starter. > > I meant that each named appcache would have a separate manifest, and the > manifest would just say the name of the one it was setting up. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090729/fef5c0a8/attachment.htm>
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 09:54:35 UTC