W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2009

[whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

From: Yuzo Fujishima <yuzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:06:57 +0900
Message-ID: <9124e09b0912080006i2b34d213t631b794222f62ecb@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (?~\??~V~G?U~O) wrote:

>> protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ?
>> (e.g. new WebSocket("ws://example.com/", " "); )
>> It seems space is optional after colon in field of handshake message, how
>> can we distinguish U+0020 and U+0020 U+0020 ?

> The space isn't optional (both the client and the server are required to
> send it before the subprotocol name), it's just that the client will
> handle a missing space gracefully. Maybe we should remove that "feature",
> and require that the space be present, closing the connection otherwise?
> I don't feel strongly either way.

> Anyway, the point is that "WebSocket-Protocol: " is the empty string, and
> "WebSocket-Protocol: ?" is a one-space protocol name.

Hi, Ian, let me confirm one thing: Empty string is not allowed for
subprotocol, is it?

Yuzo


> --
> Ian Hickson ? ? ? ? ? ? ? U+1047E ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?)\._.,--....,'``. ? ?fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/ ? ? ? U+263A ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/, ? _.. \ ? _\ ?;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer. ? `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 00:06:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:54 UTC