W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2009

[whatwg] Section 1.7 "abstract language"

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:10:34 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0908140206590.6420@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>
> "This specification defines an abstract language for describing 
> documents and applications, and some APIs for interacting with in-memory 
> representations of resources that use this language."
> 
> The phrase "abstract language" concerns me. It's not clear to me that a 
> language can be abstract, nor is it clear to me what this phrase refers 
> to, especially since it seems to be distinguished from the "concrete 
> syntaxes that can be used to transmit resources that use this abstract 
> language, two of which are defined in this specification."
> 
> Perhaps there's some sort of abstract data model or information model 
> here; but I don't believe that the word "language" is appropriate to 
> describe this. Language as normally understood is a collection of actual 
> words or symbols, written or spoken. It is not a collection of abstract 
> concepts, at least not in any definition of the term I was able to find.
> 
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=define%3Alanguage&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g10

What term would you recommend rather than "language" that is more 
understandable than "data model" or "information model"?

Would "vocabulary" be ok?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 19:10:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:51 UTC