- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:47:56 -0700
"In particular, the algorithms defined in this specification are intended to be easy to follow, and not intended to be performant." Yech. The recently coined word "performant" just grates on my ears; and I'm not the only one as a Google search will show: http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=performant Perhaps we could replace it with "efficient" or some other word or phrase? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo at ibiblio.org
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 13:47:56 UTC