- From: Manuel Amador <rudd-o@rudd-o.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:12:11 -0500
If you need to pay ?1 for copies distributed, then it isn't royalty free and it can't be on the standard as a requirement. Flat fee is not royalty free. YES, I MEANT BEING ABLE TO USE IT WITHOUT PAYING ANY KIND OF FEE. Am I too daft for my words to be understood? El Lunes 07 Ene 2008, escribi?: > On Jan 7, 2008 7:36 PM, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o at rudd-o.com> wrote: > > Out of the question, it must be royalty-free. That's one of the > > requirements, so unless you can convince the holder to go RF, no chance. > > Did you even read what I wrote? > > >>RAD doesn't charge royalties - period. You pay one flat-fee to use Bink > >>or Smacker in your product. > > If you mean being able to use it without paying _any kind_ of fee, > that's another thing. > > Royalty: a sum of money paid to a patentee for the use of a patent or > to an author or composer for _each_ copy of a book sold or for _each_ > public performance of a work. > > And about your last sentence.. As I said: > >>It might be worth trying to contact RAD and see if this could be a > > walkable road. > > -- Federico BP -- Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o at rudd-o.com> Rudd-O.com - http://rudd-o.com/ GPG key ID 0xC8D28B92 at http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ Now playing, courtesy of Amarok: Sonique - It feels so good Your boss is a few sandwiches short of a picnic. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20080107/01b53550/attachment.pgp>
Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 13:12:11 UTC